advertisement
Editors Selection IGR 9-2
List of Editor's Selection comments by
Chris Johnson
Emeritus Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Co-Director, Visual Field Reading Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Clinical Examination Methods: Tele-Perimetry: reliability and Compliance (23-2, April 2023) on:
104766 Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients
Prea SM; Vingrys AJ; Kong GYX
Journal of clinical medicine 2022; 11:
Clinical Examination Methods: How best to assess Visual Field loss in Glaucoma? (22-3, April 2022) on:
96026 Comparing Five Criteria for Evaluating Glaucomatous Visual Fields: 5 Visual Field Criteria for Evaluating Glaucoma
Stubeda H; Quach J; Gao J et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2022; 237: 154-163
Clinical Examination Methods: Computerized Quantification of Visual Field Progression (22-3, April 2022) on:
96062 Hierarchical Censored Bayesian Analysis of Visual Field Progression
Montesano G; Garway-Heath DF; Ometto G et al.
Translational vision science & technology 2021; 10: 4
Clinical Examination Methods: Virtual-Reality Perimetry (21-1, November 2020) on:
84653 Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device
Mees L; Upadhyaya S; Kumar P et al.
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 86-91
Clinical Examination Methods: Predicting Visual Field Progression (19-2, September 2018) on:
75682 Baseline 24-2 Central Visual Field Damage Is Predictive of Global Progressive Field Loss
Garg A; De Moraes CG; Cioffi GA et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2018; 187: 92-98
Clinical Examination Methods: Reliability of Visual Fields (18-4, December 2017) on:
73414 Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability
Yohannan J; Wang J; Brown J et al.
Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 1612-1620
Clinical Examination Methods: Automated kinetic perimetry (18-3, July 2017) on:
71424 Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma
Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2017; 58: 868-875
Clinical Examination Methods: Swimming goggles and IOP (18-2, April 2017) on:
70091 Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'
Matsumoto C; Yamao S; Nomoto H et al.
PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0161974
Comment (17-4, September 2016) on:
67306 Structural and Functional Progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial
Öhnell H; Heijl A; Brenner L et al.
Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 1173-1180
Glaucoma Screening: Frequency-Doubling Perimetry for Glaucoma Screening (17-3, June 2016) on:
66389 Evaluation of Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry as a Means of Screening for Glaucoma and Other Eye Diseases Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Boland MV; Gupta P; Ko F et al.
JAMA ophthalmology 2016; 134: 57-62
Clinical Examination Methods: Perimetric visual field pattern and early defect screening (16-4, September 2015) on:
60424 Modifying the Conventional Visual Field Test Pattern to Improve the Detection of Early Glaucomatous Defects in the Central 10°
Ehrlich AC; Raza AS; Ritch R et al.
Translational vision science & technology 2014; 3: 6
Therapeutic outcomes: Visual Field Improvement (16-2, March 2015) on:
57294 A Control Experiment for Studies that Show Improved Visual Sensitivity with Intraocular Pressure Lowering in Glaucoma
Anderson AJ; Stainer MJ
Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2028-2032
Epidemiology: Glaucoma as cause of blindness (16-1, December 2014) on:
55997 Examining visual field loss in patients in glaucoma clinics during their predicted remaining lifetime
Saunders LJ; Russell RA; Kirwan JF et al.
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2014; 55: 102-109
Progression: Frequency-doubling perimetry (15-4, September 2014) on:
55436 Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change
Meira-Freitas D; Tatham AJ; Lisboa R et al.
Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 498-507
Perimetry: Seasonal visual field fluctuations (15-1, September 2013) on:
53113 Seasonal changes in visual field sensitivity and intraocular pressure in the ocular hypertension treatment study
Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Gordon MO et al.
Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 724-730
Perimetry: Scotoma progression patterns (14-4, July 2013) on:
51818 Progression Pattern of Initial Parafoveal Scotomas in Glaucoma
Su D; Park SC; Simonson JL et al.
Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 520-527
Perimetry: Visual field indices and ability to drive (14-3, April 2013) on:
50973 Practical landmarks for visual field disability in glaucoma
Saunders LJ; Russell RA; Crabb DP
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012; 96: 1185-1189
Comments (13-4, April 2012) on:
48060 Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness and Local Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucoma
Raza AS; Cho J; De Moraes CGV et al.
Archives of Ophthalmology 2011; 129: 1529-1536
Visual Function Tests: Postillumination pupil responses (13-4, April 2012) on:
47976 Intrinsically photosensitive (melanopsin) retinal ganglion cell function in glaucoma
Feigl B; Mattes D; Thomas R et al.
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2011; 52: 4362-4367
Progression: Agreement of VF interpretation (13-2, October 2011) on:
45509 Agreement of visual field interpretation among glaucoma specialists and comprehensive ophthalmologists: comparison of time and methods
Lin AP; Katz LJ; Spaeth GL et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2011; 95: 828-831
Comments (13-1, June 2011) on:
27800 A Randomized Trial of Brimonidine Versus Timolol in Preserving Visual Function: Results From the Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study
Krupin T; Liebmann JM; Greenfield DS et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2011; 151: 671-681
Perimetry: Agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of progression (13-1, June 2011) on:
27931 Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of the subjective determination of glaucomatous visual field progression
Tanna AP; Bandi JR; Budenz DL et al.
Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 60-65
Population Genetics: Glaucoma in Africans versus Europeans (12-2, September 2010) on:
26213 African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes
Racette L; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA et al.
Archives of Ophthalmology 2010; 128: 551-559
Function Tests: Microperimetry versus Humphrey 10-2 (12-1, June 2010) on:
25055 A Comparison between Microperimetry and Standard Achromatic Perimetry of the Central Visual Field in Eyes with Glaucomatous Paracentral Visual Field Defects
Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; 94: 64-67
Clinical Examination Methods: New developments: Multifocal pupillography (11-4, March 2010) on:
24796 Multifocal pupillographic visual field testing in glaucoma
Maddess T; Bedford SM; Goh XL et al.
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2009; 37: 678-686
Visual Function and Structure: Socioeconomic and clinical factors (11-2, September 2009) on:
23909 The influence of socioeconomic and clinical factors upon the presenting visual field status of patients with glaucoma
Sukumar S; Spencer F; Fenerty C et al.
Eye 2009; 23: 1038-1044
Visual Function Tests: VF progression criteria (10-3, December 2008) on:
21862 A comparison of visual field progression criteria of 3 major glaucoma trials in early manifest glaucoma trial patients
Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Chauhan BC et al.
Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1557-1565
Structure and function measurements: Visual field index and rate of progression (10-1, July 2008) on:
20340 A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2008; 145: 343-353
Visual function: SITA versus FDT (9-1, June 2007) on:
16946 Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry
Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H et al.
Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 480-487
Visual function: SITA versus FDT (9-1, June 2007) on:
16842 Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc
Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN et al.
Archives of Ophthalmology 2007; 125: 340-345
Examination methods: To SWAP or SAP; that's the question (8-3, December 2006) on:
14106 Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1092-1097
Clinical examination methods: Progression analysis and visual field (7-2, November 2005) on:
12489 Bayes' theorem applied to perimetric progression detection in glaucoma: from specificity to positive predictive value
Jansonius NM
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2005; 243: 433-437
Visual function (7-1, June 2005) on:
11706 Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Parisi L et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005; 89: 180-184
